Justice Dept should charge WikiLeaks’ Assange with sedition

Do our laws protect a troubled and dysfunctional Australian cultural renegade who ignores the accepted conventions of human decency, thumbs his nose at U.S. institutions, and posts on the Internet deep secrets of national defense and awkward details of diplomatic interplay? No. Certainly our nation’s provisions against those who steal state secrets to harm our nation and advance their own ends dictate that WikiLeaks malefactor Julian Assange should be charged with seditious acts against the United States. Although he may not be guilty of treason, which may require an attempt to other the overthrow the government, he is certainly guilty of sedition:  “any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection.”

Action is being taken by the U.S. against the WikiLeaks site:

The US opened new fronts in its fight against WikiLeaks today as civil rights groups accused the authorities of censorship.

The whistleblower’s website went offline for the third time in a week this morning – the biggest threat to its online presence so far. The site re-emerged later on a Swiss domain.

France joined international calls for WikiLeaks to be closed down, warning that it was “unacceptable” for a “criminal” site to be hosted in the country.

The moves came only days after Amazon pulled the WikiLeaks site from its servers after political pressure from Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate homeland security committee.

Lieberman is not finished with Amazon, and is planning to write to the organisation within the next 24 hours asking for details of its relationship with WikiLeaks. The issue is fast turning into a row over freedom of speech, as Democratic and Republican politicians joined calls for action against WikiLeaks, including emergency legislation for legal challenge.

The Christian Science Monitor says that authorities are investigating Assauge:

Australian and US law enforcement agencies are reportedly studying the possibility of criminal charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, including charges under the Espionage Act, for publishing classified US diplomatic cables.

“We have an active, ongoing criminal investigation with regard to this matter,” US Attorney-General Eric Holder told a press conference on Monday.

I do not expect this Justice Department to put national security above civil liberties. It is doubtful that it will take action. That is a shame, because Assuage is not a civil libertarian; he’s a criminal, and the WikiLeaks precedent is dangerous.

WikiLeaks should be shut down, and Assange should be shut up. I think he’d look good in a jumpsuit at Gitmo. Leak that.

Advertisements

About Jim Jewell

I am a writer and consultant on faith and public life, active for many years in management and communications in the evangelical community. I now work as the director of the nonprofit practice at The Valcort Group (www.valcort.com). Everything on this blog, however, is my personal opinion and is not read or approved before it is posted. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of Valcort.
This entry was posted in Criminal justice, Jim Jewell, Politics, Virtue and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Justice Dept should charge WikiLeaks’ Assange with sedition

  1. Ashley Carey says:

    I think you’re crazy.

    • Jim Jewell says:

      Don’t think so, but who am I to say. In any case, the U.S. will have to wait for for the Europeans to process sexual misconduct charges against Assange. This is a bad dude, my friend.

      • Ashley Carey says:

        His charge is a Sweden-only law againt having consensual sex without a condom. They file it under rape laws, and the whole existence of the law would be really embarrassing for Sweden if this was common knowledge. And to top it off, there was a condom. It broke. This lady’s milking it, and that’s the whole of the “rape charge.” He leaked documents, but he’s not any sort of rapist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s